Skip to main content

How did your country handle coronavirus? Americans, Brits have most negative responses

 


United by a common language and high levels of political polarization, the USA and United Kingdom stand out in a new survey as two nations whose populations are split over how well their governments handled the COVID-19 pandemic.

Across 14 mostly European countries, people were canvassed for attitudes about whether their leaders did a good job responding to the coronavirus: 52% of Americans and 54% of Britons have a negative or "bad" impression, according to the Pew Research Center, a nonpartisan "fact tank" that carried out the survey of advanced economies. 

This compares with a median of about 7-in-10 – 73% – who give their nation's coronavirus response a positive or "good" review in Denmark, Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, South Korea, Italy and Sweden. More than half of those surveyed in Belgium, France, Japan and Spain look favorably on the job their government has done responding to the pandemic, the surveyed says.

The country with the most positive assessment is Denmark, where 95% say authorities have done a "good" job.

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen adjusts her face mask as she arrives for a European Union summit on a coronavirus recovery package at the European Council building in Brussels on July 19.

The Scandinavian country rushed to shut its borders and imposed a strict coronavirus lockdown in mid-March almost before any other European country. It was the first nation in the region to reopen its schools and commercial sectors. An academic paper published by researchers at Denmark's Aarhus University partly attributed the country's effective management of the coronavirus crisis to its free and flexible health care system, a high level of trust in authorities and a lack of conspiracy theories or widespread panic from the public about the government's handling of the outbreak. 

COVID-19:Coronavirus changes everyday life across the USA

According to John Hopkins University's COVID-19 dashboard, 624 people in Denmark have died and more than 17,000 have been infected with the coronavirus as of Thursday. In the USA, almost 180,000 people have died and more than 5.8 million people – a figure roughly equivalent to Denmark's entire population – have been infected. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Coronavirus: Can California's economy survive the latest surge?

  Image copyright EPA Image caption California's coronavirus outbreak is hurting the tourism industry Earlier this year, California was praised for an early lockdown, which helped stem the pandemic in the US state. But cases have since surged. What's next for the Golden State, known for Hollywood, sunshine and celebrity? Scott DeAngelis spent a decade building up a lucrative tour guide operation on Hollywood Boulevard. For years tourists flocked to the Hollywood Walk of Fame and there was always enough work to go around. But now there are more palm trees than people and the stars once hard to find under the feet of potential customers, now bake, exposed to the midday sun. Hope was briefly on the horizon when California Governor Gavin Newsom announced a phased reopening plan. He said it would be a dimmer switch, gradually shining a brighter light at the end of this dark tunnel. But cases began to rise again after the Memorial Day weekend in late May - and the dimmer switch has n...

Coronavirus: Are women and children less affected?

  Image copyright SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY Women seem to be less likely to die from coronavirus than men, and children appear to be less likely to die than other age groups. Most people will get a mild infection, but the pattern is clear in the most severe cases. So what is going on? All the information we have is coming from a massive study by the Chinese Centres of Disease Control. It looked at 44,000 people and showed 2.8% of infected men died, compared with 1.7% of women. And 0.2% of children and teenagers died compared with nearly 15% of people over the age of 80. Are women and children less likely to catch coronavirus? There are two ways of explaining the findings. Either these groups are less likely to be infected in the first place, or their bodies are more able to cope with the virus. "Normally with new viruses circulating, everybody gets infected: that's the important point," says Dr Bharat Pankhania, from the University of Exeter. This is because there is no imm...

Coronavirus: How will deaf schoolchildren cope with face coverings? And other questions

  Children are returning to school throughout the UK, many of them for the first time since lockdown in March. Here are some of your questions about the challenges ahead. Questions and answers Back to school Your questions Skip Back to school Is it a good idea to send kids back to school if they have a heart problem? from Zoe Corran in Bangor BBC News People who have a serious heart condition are more vulnerable to coronavirus. Many children with heart conditions will, until recently, have been shielding to protect themselves. Experts are now looking into whether as many children will need to shield in the future,  given the reduced level of risk posed to children. Across the UK, children who have been shielding are expected to return to school. However, if a child has an extremely serious condition, your doctor can advice otherwise and parents should engage with the child’s school about the best way to continue their studies. If there is an increase in cases in an area and ...